KingAaron
(offline)
- Joined: May 2006
- Location: Adelaide
- Posts: 51
|
Fri May 26, 2006 2:05 pm
Hey Question for all of you. Iam a Student EN working as a Med Com Senior PC, within a Low Care Facility. I was told by a CNC i know, that PC who are med comp, can administer a S8 drug, as long as it is in a webster pack, and is counter signed by another staff member. Now from what I already understood and through, PC's were only allowed to counter sign, and that is only in some facilities. Ive been to places, where only the RN's do the S8, and others where RN n EN do it. Others where EN and PC are allowed but not agency, which is understandable, but in todays work places, not having agency on shift is well .. like not having patients ... just dosnt happen lol .. But your comments and throughs around this are welcomed with interest. I personally, as a PC would NEVER administer a S8, I will check, but thats as far as I go, untill Iam a EN which is December 6th YAY :) Aaron
|
|
Nighters
(offline)
- Joined: May 2006
- Location: Geelong
- Posts: 7
|
Jun 03, 2006, 06:33 pm
Well I would say PCA's shouldn't touch S8 at all. Websterpack are designed for self adminstration, if the resident can't take the drugs out of the pack themselves then they require medication administration by a Div 1 or Endorsed Div 2. Well thats the rules here in Victoria, the ANF will help you if your unsure. No point in a PCA counter signing anything, they have no understanding of what the drug really is. For years they stopped that at Barwon Health cause of that reason, they don't have the training behind them. I think PCA's are great but they are PCA's not nurses, and should not be put in that role, I shudder to think what might happen if they had to explain that in court if something went wrong. "Oh Judge sorry, two PCA's counter signed its fine, shame the resident died, but they are only PCA's afterall." That has happened by the way, and it was ruled the PCA's worked outside their scope of practice, and didn't have any clue on their duty of care to the client.
|
|
KingAaron
(offline)
- Joined: May 2006
- Location: Adelaide
- Posts: 51
|
Jun 03, 2006, 08:36 pm
"Websterpack are designed for self adminstration, if the resident can't take the drugs out of the pack themselves then they require medication administration by a Div 1 or Endorsed Div 2." <--- All Medication in Aged Care Facilities here in SA is packed in a webster or some form of webster system. To enable PC's and EN's to administer medications. I think PCA's are great but they are PCA's not nurses, and should not be put in that role, <---- The way the nursing shortage is going the new Cert III that is reuqired by PCs to get work in aged care is the old EN course. So PC's that are finishing off there study course, are able to give meds and do a lot of general basic nursing duties. Depending on where you work and I only speak for SA here, depends on what ur job entails,. I go to some places where Iam in charge, doing the meds, wounds, supervising care staff, doctors visits, and so on. Other places Iam a carer and attend to ADL's and Personal Care. No point in a PCA counter signing anything, they have no understanding of what the drug really is. <---- I fully agree with the point of why counter sign for a S8 when you dont know what it is, but it still happends, go to a Nursing Home, and you have the RN asking PC's to counter sign and 8/10 times the PC has no idea what they are signing, or if a dug calc has to be worked out it is generally only the RN doing the calc and the PC taking the RN's word bout it. Aaron
|
|
chajo
(offline)
- Joined: Aug 2005
- Location: Brisbane
- Posts: 6
|
Jul 01, 2006, 11:00 am
I am concerned about the processes in places where facilities allow PC to administer S8 from a webster pack. I agree with other contributors - if the resident cannot administer from a webster pack and require PC support they should not be self medicating;. We have just be audited for accreditation and the auditors were heavy on 2.7 - how would these facilities justify a compliance rating here. Just a hint - major focus on 2.10, 4.2 4.7 also.
|
|
Nighters
(offline)
- Joined: May 2006
- Location: Geelong
- Posts: 7
|
Jul 02, 2006, 05:12 pm
Just on this issue there was a hostel that just tried to sack 30 rndiv2's because PC are cheaper and can do meds. I think the system of Governmnet sucks in allowing this to occur. As I said before PC has its place and so does Nurses but when the lines are blurred it causes havoc. Geez I really don't think I would get old and go into any home, you just don't know who is looking after you. As for all meds being packed into self admin systems thats a danger in its self, massive amount of mistakes have occured using those systems. I spend a good 3 hours a night rechecking webster paks for a 106 residents multi-packs and at least 1/3 are wrong, each time they come up for the new week. And its painful when they change drugs on you without sending the updated forms. If I had a dollar for everytime that happened I wouldn't be working nights. LMAO Sorry bad day at the office, my rant has now finished and I will go and get coffee.
|
|
hayles
(offline)
- Joined: Mar 2007
- Location: Launceston
- Posts: 10
|
Mar 21, 2007, 04:42 pm
Hi I am currently studying cert III Aged Care via correspondence, but by doing this via correspondence I wont be doing module CHCCS304A Assist with self medication, but I did study it while at tafe (this is when i started my cert III Aged Care originally, but had to quit as I got a job, I have since moved states and am now studying cert III aged care via correspondence. Now with my previous studies with Assist with self medication I know that Schedule 8 are Drugs of Addiction, I have also just found some more information about Schedule 8 Drugs, this is what I found:
'The person administering a schedule 8 medication must be a registered nurse or medical practitioner' this is the link to where I found this information: http://www.health.nsw.gov.au/archive/cib/information-bulletins/2003/ib2003-10.pdf anyway you may already know all this, but I thought maybe if would help, I know its helped me.
|
|
PrincessDemonik
(offline)
- Joined: Mar 2007
- Location: Sydney
- Posts: 16
|
Mar 29, 2007, 08:36 pm
This is an ongoing issue in aged care. I will refer you to the Guidelines for Medication Management in residential Aged Care Facilities “For residents who are not self-administering, medication administration should be undertaken by a registered nurse or authorised enrolled nurse. If a registered nurse or an authorised enrolled nurse is not available, it is recommended that the facility provide medications in dose administration aids. In all cases, medication should only be administered by qualified or suitably trained staff.” (page 10) Further, when you refer to page 24 in the Manual, medications must be administered by a registered nurse in a nursing home. You’ll find that in low care facilities eg hostels, PCAs and CSs are being handed the responsibility of administering medications. To my current knowledge, if a Schedule 8 drug is packaged in a multidose system (those webster packs where there are a few different pills in each compartment) the PCA/CS can administer it IF they have been assessed as medication competent. The rationale behind this is that the PCA/CS is unable to identify the S8D from all the other medications (silly, I know, but there it is). A drug register is not used. Registered nurses are not allowed to administer medications in a multidose system, as we must account for and identify each separate medication. If the S8D is packaged and stored separately, ONLY a registered nurse can administer it. A PCA/CS/EN/EEN can check the drug, but not give it. In this case a drug register is signed by the RN and other person.
|
|
Rotator Cuff
(offline)
- Joined: May 2007
- Location: Brisbane
- Posts: 85
|
Aug 23, 2007, 10:46 am
Hello there, I have been an AIN in high care for 3 years now, I personally would not like the responsibility of dealing with DDA's, or any drugs for that matter, without having proper training. By proper training, I mean what effect drugs have on the body, being able to notice a change in behaviour, watching for any adverse outcomes from medication,etc etc, it not just a matter of popping pills out of a pack. I will wait till I finish my EEN before I have anything to do with meds. Sometimes AIN's have been asked to count with the RN and sign, but it hasn't been done for a while now. Now our RN's say: "going up to do drugs" AIN's Reply: "have fun don't get to high" Love my RN's, they are such a hoot. RC
|
|
tropicana
(offline)
- Joined: Mar 2007
- Location:
- Posts: 62
|
Aug 23, 2007, 04:52 pm
KingAaron, I would not administer a drug of any description unless you are aware of the law in your state AND your facility has documented policy on your role. All people not just RNs are responsible for their actions, and in a health facility this is proscribed by your qualifications. If an adverse incident occurs that requires legal intervention, every single person is questioned as to what involvement they had in every single tiny aspect of that person's care. I am not just speaking as an RN. I was an EN for many years, and in my hospital policy was for ENs not to give meds, despite their qualifications. Be anal about it - I was. If an RN gave me any medication I refused to give it, even if I had seen what it was and I had seen the med chart. The other ENs were the same, and the RNs found it annoying especially seeing as they had all come from facilities where there are medication endorsed ENs, but they followed our lead, realising their own qualifications and reputations were on the line. Remember, a facility would be mad if they had policy which contravened the law; they'd also be crazy if they didn't have policy at all because they would be leaving themselves wide open to litigation. Ask to see it. You are protecting not just yourself, but those you work with, and as in my case, they may not be aware of the facility policy. Go well, and be careful.
|
|
Molly
(offline)
- Joined: Apr 2007
- Location:
- Posts: 135
|
Aug 23, 2007, 09:13 pm
tropicana ! I was just wondering in which state are you a RN. I am from Brisbane.
|
|
KingAaron
(offline)
- Joined: May 2006
- Location: Adelaide
- Posts: 51
|
Aug 24, 2007, 07:21 am
HI Its funny how across the country our basic job description si the same, yet we can and can't do so many different tasks, Iam not not out in the field nursing, iam doing Recuritment and Allocation work now, whilst I complete my course. My last role @ a Low Care Facilitiy, as I was emplyed as a Team Leader, doing medication rounds was my main job for a shift, among many other things. Our policy for administering S8 (we have 3 residents on a S8 TDS) was so long as it was in a webster pack, then I could adminster it, mind you the pack remains locked up and normal S8 security so to speak, ie: key on seperate, 2 to sign, count book, and the actual pill counted x3 a day. If for whatever reason a resident was dishcarged from hospitial, or came back with a packet of S8 medication, then I either had to get the DON to come in and give it when it was due, and then send it to the chemist to be packed. Always interesting to get the other states point of view, in relation to different things, Thanks to everyone for their point of view with this matter. Aaron
|
|
KingAaron
(offline)
- Joined: May 2006
- Location: Adelaide
- Posts: 51
|
Aug 24, 2007, 07:30 am
Me Again Yes I no I said back when i posted first post re this topic I would not administer S8's, but that changed as I said in my last role very quickly. Especially when we could not fill the EN role, and as i got further with my training, I was doing more EN duties at work, and then ended up doing the EN role, as a Senior PC, always had my DOC at the other end of the phone if for whatever reason I needed her, so the support was there, How times change Aaron
|
|
tropicana
(offline)
- Joined: Mar 2007
- Location:
- Posts: 62
|
Aug 25, 2007, 07:16 pm
Molly, I am in the Northern Territory. King Aaron, you are right, it is so interesting how things change between states and institutions. Yet EN training is becoming more uniform as it has now been introduced into universities. If only the nursing boards, and care institutions would do the same... BTW I was just thinking - there are private companies that employ non nurses to go out and ensure that pts unable (eg due to memory loss) to take their medications observe them doing so from their Webster packs. And the disability organisations also have carers that dispense from Webster packs too. The policy of my hospital though doesn't allow ENs to give meds. :( Alot of the girls/guys who have spent a considerable time in their course studyng pharmacology are understandably quite upset, as they fear they may lose their knowledge.
|
|
Senior RN
(offline)
- Joined: Dec 2008
- Location:
- Posts: 24
|
Dec 26, 2008, 11:38 am
OK, guys, this is how it works... regardless of which State you are in, or Public or Private employer..... Firstly, the legal principle of ' Vicarious Liability ' is always applicable. This means, that your EMPLOYER takes full responsibility for the actions of each and every employee. So, if your boss wants you to do something ( by way of Policy or Procedure ), then you are fully covered in one legal sense. The main problem here, is that employers will ALWAYS try to get out of it, when there is a big stuff up. Behind the scenes, they will decide who is to be 'sacrificed' ( take the blame ), and all attempts will be made to discredit the unfortunate employee chosen to 'take the fall' for the employer. You can bet, that an 'agency nurse' will always be made the scapegoat, rather than blame a full time staff member. This then flows onto the concept of Webster Packs, and all manner of staff designations administering the contents. If your facility uses Webster Packs, and your boss says, it's what they want you to do, that is, give out the meds., then it doesn't matter who or what you are.... you are covered by Vicarious Liability. In NSW, we have a State Govt. department known as DADHC ( Department of Disability, Aging & Home Care ). I worked for them, as a contracted agency nurse for several months a few years ago. I knew of many situations, where untrained ( I mean untrained, ie., first aid cert. only ) staff were totally responsible for administration of medications... and that included S8s. Now, many of these guys were what we sometimes refer to as ' back packers ', working their way around the country. They had a first aid cert. and DADHC said, they would be trained to Cert.III in Disability Work along the way. Problem is, that 'along the way', they were fully responsible for all the meds. in their house ( employment location ). No RNs / ENs are employed. The 'house manager' may or may not be from a nursing background. It's not a requirement to be a 'house manager'. This situation comes back to Vicarious Liability again. The employer gives permission to do this task. I checked with NSW Department of Health. According to the information officer I spoke with, there is no requirement to be a 'nurse' of any grading, in order to administer meds. from a Webster Pack. The main reason being, that the PHARMACIST is the person responsible. He / she has checked each med. and signed to certify that the drug is 'true and correct' in the Pack. NSW Health don't care who gives the meds. to the patient, as long as there is no allegation of wilful misuse. Eg. Over dosing patient, by giving all meds. at once. So, in summay, it doesn't matter if you called an AIN, a PCA, a Worker, or you are a bloody back packer !!! You can give out any medication, as long as your boss wants you to. However, as an RN / EN, you have a different level of responsibility, because our actions are governed by Legislation ( Eg. NSW Nurses Act, 1991, as amended ) As the majority of staff working in 'Aged Care' are UNREGULATED staff, there is no one set of laws to determine what you can or can't do, other than the principle of Vicarious Liability...... regards,
|
|
You need to be logged in to get access to the forums. You can do so here